MAF Masonry knowledge base

Masonry Association of Florida, Inc. Florida Builds with BLOCK, BRICK & Stone.
  • News
  • Knowledge Base
  • FloridaMasonry.com

SATISFYING the 4-hour fire rating requirement without using vermiculite

2/23/2021

2 Comments

 
There were provisions to use a fill material for hollow units to increase the fire resistance rating. In past, materials like zonolite (vermiculite) were used and a 6\" filled hollow unit would provide over 4 hours of fire resistance. Due to asbestos issues, vermiculite is no longer used. Is there a similar product that can be used?

The fill material could be a variety of material, The key is what the CMU is manufactured with. If the 6" CMU is manufactured using sand and/or limestone aggregate you cannot reach a 4 hr equivalent rating. What you fill the cores with takes on the rating as the CMU. Full lightweight CMU with cores filled will meet a 4 hr requirement. A proper blend of sand and lightweight with filled cores may meet 4 hrs. The blend will have to be verified by an independent lab. Fill material can be practically anything that is fireproof itself. Perlite, sand, expanded clay aggregate and masonry cell fill (course or fine grout) are possibilities.  

The Masonry Society has an excellent book on Fire Resistance of Masonry. Chapter 7 Section 722 covers calculated fire resistance in the IBC. I am attaching a link to the NCMA TEK that covers the same subject. 

FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS OF CONCRETE MASONRY ASSEMBLIES - NCMA 

Thank you for contacting the MAF.  Our goal is to make sure that when masonry is designed and installed correctly the public has the best wall system available.
Be safe,
Jerry M Painter, FASTM
352-494-8955
2 Comments

Correct code to use to certify CMU

3/2/2020

0 Comments

 
Correct code to use to certify CMU for a project designed under a previous edition of the FL Building Code.

Our project calls for 2 hr rated block and was permitted under the 2010 FL Building Code. The engineer is not approving our submittal because the manufacturer is certifying the block under the 5th Edition, 2014 FL Building Code. He is saying that the block must be certified and tested under the 2010 code? What is going on?
​Your reviewing engineer is being a bit obsessive over a moot point. Table 721.3.2 in the 2007 FBC with 2009 revisions is EXACTLY the same table as 721.3.2 in the 2010 FBC which is EXACTLY the same table as 722.3.2 in the 5th Ed FBC which is EXACTLY the same table as 722.3.2 in the current 6th Ed FBC. And I do mean EXACTLY the same table. There have been no changes in this table for the past 30 years or more. 4 inch Eq Thickness of limestone agg gets you a 2 hour rating in 2007 and in 2019 - period, end of story. Additionally, the C140 testing procedures have remained exactly the same over the same 30+ years. The project was permitted under the 2010 FBC and thus is ALLOWED to be constructed under the requirements that governed at the time it was designed and reviewed (so you are not required to completely redesign the project under the current codes). It is my understanding that this does NOT mean that everyone supplying materials to the job have to climb into a time machine and retro backwards 10 years to resurrect and construct the job by historical - and out of date - standards. 

That being said, your standards in the certification are not correct either way (neither 2010 or 2017. My view is that you should be testing and certifying your product under the current code (2017) and that the engineer of record should accept the current codes and standards governing construction in Florida. The question is moot because the governing procedures, and tables, have not changed.
0 Comments

Masonry Fire Rating - Exterior stucco & Interior wallboard

5/9/2019

1 Comment

 
We are working on an existing building and need to know if the exterior 8" masonry walls are 2 hr fire rated in order to make a determination as to the Building Type. The exterior walls are covered in direct applied stucco and the interior walls are covered with gypsum drywall. Can we be reasonably sure that the walls, with stucco and drywall, meet the requirements for 2 hours?

The only way to be 100% sure is to remove 6 block intact from the structure and send them to the lab to be tested to determine that they meet the requirements of C90 and what the equivalent thickness of the units are in accordance with C140. you would also need to verify that the material used in manufacturing the units is limestone.

All that being said, you can make some conservative assumptions and be relatively certain that the walls meet 2 hours using the provisions of Chapter 7 of the 2017 Florida Building Code 6th Ed., Building.

Since 99.9% of all block manufactured in Florida use limestone as the main aggregate you can safely assume that the block in the building are limestone based, thus requiring a 4" equivalent thickness in accordance with Table 722.3.2.

The least equivalent thickness for any block regularly produced in South Florida is 3.6 inches. An example of this would be the CEMEX T007. Thus 3.6 would be a conservative assumption for the block used in a building in SW Florida. Interpolation of the table is allowed so that 3.6" gives you 100 minutes. Thus, you are .4" and 20 minutes short of your required 2 hr rating.

Section 722.3.2.1 gives you directions on how to calculate the fire rating value of finishes applied to the non fire-exposed side of the wall and Section 722.3.2.2 gives you directions on how to calculate the value of finishes on the fire-exposed side. These sections refer you to Table 722.2.1.4(1) for the non fire-exposed side and Table 722.2.1.4(2) for the fire-exposed side. If there is doubt from which side the code is requiring the rating the best thing is to calculate from both side and take the least value.

Conservative assumptions on the wallboard and stucco would be 1/2" wallboard and 3/8" (.375") single coat stucco (the stucco would not be to code but would be conservative for the purpose of calculating a conservative value of the fire rating).
​
Running the calc with the fire side assumed as the exterior you get:
  • Stucco value from Table 722.2.1.4(2) (note a.) - .375"
  • Wallboard value from Table 722.2.1.4(1) - 3x.5"=1.5"
  • Total equivalent thickness = 3.6+.375+1.5=5.47">4" OK
  • Running the calc with the fire side assumed as the interior you get:
  • Wallboard value from Table 722.2.1.4(2) - 15 min
  • Stucco value from Table 722.2.1.4(1) - .375"
  • Total equivalent thickness = 3.6+.375=3.975"=1 hr and 58.75 minutes.
  • Adding in the wallboard value of 15 minutes you get 2hr and 13.75 minutes > 2 ok.
  • Thus, a reasonably conservative assumption would be that your wall meets a 2 hr rating.
Additional documents:

FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS OF CONCRETE MASONRY ASSEMBLIES

1 Comment

    Authors:

    Picture
    Jerry Painter, FASTM
    352-378-7511
    painterjm@gmail.com 

    Picture
    Don Beers, PE, GC
    561-310-9902
    don@floridamasonry.com

    Categories

    All
    #5 Rebar
    Backer Rod
    Backup Wall
    Bar Hooks
    Block Strength
    Bond Beam
    Bond Breakers
    Brick
    Brick Veneer
    C129
    C90
    Cavity Wall
    Cell Size
    Cell Width
    Cmu
    Code Editions
    Code Requirements
    Codes
    Concrete Block
    Concrete Interlocking Pavers
    Concrete Pavers
    Construction Guidance
    Control Joint
    Control Joints
    Corner Attachments
    Cracking
    Crosswebs
    De-bonded Veneer
    Density
    Design Criteria
    Driveway
    Energy
    Energy Efficiency
    Energy Loss
    Envelope Leakage
    Expansion Joints
    FBC
    FBC 6th Edition
    FBC 7th Edition
    Filling Cells
    Fine Aggregate Grout
    Fire Rating
    Florida Building Code
    F''m
    Grouted Beam
    Grout Height
    Grouting
    Grouting Of Block Walls
    High Strength Masonry
    High-strength Masonry
    High Wind
    High Wind Construction
    HJR
    Horizontal Steel Spacing
    ICC 600
    ICC Code
    Infill
    In-plane
    Insulation
    Integral Waterproofing
    Interlocking Pavers
    Intermediate
    Intersecting Walls
    Job Requirements
    Jobsite
    Joint Reinforcement
    Light-weight
    Masonry
    Masonry Construction
    Masonry Details
    Masonry Insulation
    Masonry Websites
    Masonry Workmanship
    Max Bar Size
    Missile Impact
    Mortar
    Mortar Joints
    Net Area Strength
    Out-of-plane
    Perm
    Pnnl
    Psi
    Rebar
    Reinforcement
    Residential
    R Value
    Safety
    Setting Pavers
    Shear Walls
    Shrinkage
    Slip Joints
    Sound Insulation
    Sound Transmission
    Split-face Block
    STC Rating
    Sticky Stone
    Stucco
    Stucco Bonding
    Stucco Over Lath
    Table 2
    Thin Veneer
    Tie Beams
    TMS
    TMS 402/602
    Tyvek
    UL
    UL Labeling
    Vapor Barrier
    Vertical Steel
    Vertical Walls
    Videos
    Wall Bending
    Wall Design
    Wall Tolerances
    Water Intrusion
    Waterproofing
    Water Vapor
    Wind

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018

    RSS Feed

Masonry Resources

Clay Brick Masonry
Concrete Masonry
Mortar & Grout
Reinforcing Steel
Sustainability & LEED
Wall System Comparisons


MAF Websites

​Find out more about Masonry
​Pre-Apprentice Programs by visiting:
www.MasonryEducation.org
Picture
Masonry Association of Florida, Inc. |PO Box 24474 , Fort Lauderdale, FL 33307
Copyright  ©  2017. All Rights Reserved.
Sitemap
  • News
  • Knowledge Base
  • FloridaMasonry.com